Reluctant Catholic Thoughts about the church and my faith.


5
Nov/08
1

Catholic-Muslim dialogue

Interesting story here from CNA on Catholic-Muslim dialogues that just started. This Time article, has a bit more detail on the talks; as does this USA Today article. Digging a little deeper, you can find the actual open letter that sparked the talks here along with a time-line summarizing events leading up to the talks. The open letter is worth reading. Hopefully, the talks will be fruitful for both sides.

Two quotes from the document:

Muslims thus appreciate the following words from the Second Vatican Council:

"The church has also a high regard for the Muslims. They worship God, who is one, living and subsistent, merciful and almighty, the Creator of heaven and earth, who has also spoken to humanity. They endeavor to submit themselves without reserve to the hidden decrees of God, just as Abraham submitted himself to God’s plan, to whose faith Muslims eagerly link their own. Although not acknowledging him as God, they venerate Jesus as a prophet; his virgin Mother they also honor, and even at times devoutly invoke. Further, they await the day of judgment and the reward of God following the resurrection of the dead. For this reason they highly esteem an upright life and worship God, especially by way of prayer, alms-deeds and fasting. (Nostra Aetate, 28 October 1965)"

and

And equally the words of the late Pope John Paul II, for whom many Muslims had great regard and esteem:

"We Christians joyfully recognize the religious values we have in common with Islam. Today I would like to repeat what I said to young Muslims some years ago in Casablanca: 'We believe in the same God, the one God, the living God, the God who created the world and brings his creatures to their perfection' (Insegnamenti, VIII/2, [1985], p.497, quoted during a general audience on May 5, 1999)."

Filed under: In the news
9
Oct/08
0

Cardinal Arinze Webcast

Found a great link today (via CNS) to Cardinal Arinze's webcast. I'll have to get this setup in iTunes. I particularly like this post.

19
Sep/08
0

Vatican Secret Archives

The CNS recently released this story on Pope Pius XII saving Jewish lives. It's a direct response to stories like this one. Now, the CNS story seems like a non-issue to me, only because I personally can't imagine someone actually thinking that a pope would sit by while something as atrocious as death camps were going on. I mean really, who thinks that? (I know... I know... I'm naive sometimes.)

What's interesting to me is the reference (in both stories) to the Vatican Secret Archives. Who knew those even existed? (I know... I know... like I said, I'm naive sometimes.) Couldn't we come up with a better name or something? Are there priests with 007 agent numbers out there? How Dan Brown can we get? You can't make this stuff up it seems.

17
Sep/08
0

The church and politics

This letter from Archbishop John C. Favalora lifts my spirits, on many different levels. Let's take it a piece at a time...

A group called the Alliance Defense Fund is urging pastors across the country to join their Pulpit Freedom Initiative by preaching a sermon “that addresses the candidates for government office in light of the truth of Scripture.”

The group’s goal is to challenge the Internal Revenue Service’s restriction on tax-exempt organizations “by specifically opposing candidates for office that do not align themselves and their positions with the scriptural truth.”

Needless to say, none of our Catholic churches or priests will be participating in this initiative. For one thing, we can do a lot for our communities with the money we save by being tax-exempt. That is why we accept that status and agree to abide by IRS rules that ban religious organizations from becoming involved in partisan politics.

When I read that last line (or the entire last paragraph), I detect a hint of sarcasm. Perhaps he's even being sardonic? Either way, I like it.

For another, “scriptural truth” is not that easy to attain. Which is more “true” in terms of scripture: The Old Testament passage that says “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth” or Jesus’ admonition to “turn the other cheek”?

The problem is that people often quote selectively from Scripture in order to back their own opinions. The other problem is that rarely, if ever, does an individual candidate or political party embody the gamut of “scriptural truth.”

The Catholic Church values Scripture, but we also value 2,000 years of oral and written tradition handed down from the apostles and their disciples, and another 2,000 years of ongoing theological reflection by some of the greatest thinkers and saints.

For the record, can we get more statements like that? It's clear, concise, provides example, and to the point. I like it. It also does it in a way that's not apologetic for the view.

When we teach on a particular moral issue, we rely on the whole of that tradition rather than on any individual’s opinion or interpretation of Scripture.

That is not to say that we are not involved in politics. Catholics do not give up their right to vote or take political sides when they are baptized.

But the role of the church is not to be like the “party boss” who goes around telling people how to vote. Our responsibility is to remind people to vote wisely; to reveal to them the wisdom of Scripture, the wisdom of the church’s moral tradition, so that they can base their votes on solid moral ground.

Good use of contrasting.

Too often, people vote based on their feelings, or on the partial sound-bites of candidates pushing a particular point of view. More often than not, decisions based on feelings or partial information turn out to be wrong.

That is why it is especially important for voters to study all sides of an issue — or candidate — and examine that information in light of their own beliefs and values.

True, and sound advice. I like that he states that people should vote based on their own beliefs and values - not the church's. That's important, because it implies that it is up to those people to decide if their values match the church's values. I like that implication because it requires responsibility on the part of the voter. It requires work.

When church leaders speak on issues such as immigration, poverty, health care, abortion, war or embryonic stem cell research, we are not telling people how to vote. We are reminding them of the moral teachings that should inform their lives, and as a result, their votes.

I'd like to think that's true with all priests I've seen speak on those topics, but I'm not sure. Either way, I like that this is the stated goal of those talks. I think those reminders are crucial, and I appreciate the serious thought and research I often hear in the sermons where those topics are talked about.

We will not speak on behalf of individual candidates or parties. But we will speak in support of legislation that we consider to be morally sound and beneficial to the whole community — regardless of which party or candidate proposes it — and we will speak against legislation that we consider harmful to individuals and society as a whole.

In the coming weeks, you will be hearing from the bishops of Florida regarding important issues that we believe will impact the future well-being of all the people in our state.

That is our duty as teachers and successors of the apostles.

Your duty as Catholics is to listen to those teachings before making rational, informed, conscientious decisions regarding whom or what to vote for.

Thank you. Now I'm a little depressed I don't live in Florida.

10
Sep/08
0

Evolution

One of the things I particularly like about the Catholic church is it's stance on evolution. A recent CNS story outlined an upcoming international conference on evolution. The article included some links to some related stories:

Over the summer, the Vatican newspaper ran a series of articles on Darwinism, creation and intelligent design. In a nutshell, they said evolution and Christian faith are compatible as long as evolutionary theories do not exclude a greater divine plan.

Pope Benedict XVI has also shown a keen interest in the issue and its implications for the faith. He described creation as an “intelligent project” in 2005 and hosted his former doctoral students in a symposium about evolution in 2006.

I was very interested in the articles the Vatican newspaper ran, but alas, I couldn't find them. I'm normally fairly good at tracking that stuff down, but no luck this time.

I like the church's stance because it recognizes that their doesn't have to be a conflict between God and science. They two aren't mutually exclusive, and in fact, in many places work to support one another. From everything I can read, it appears that a big push of Pope Benedict XVI is to show that relationship. I'm very glad.

In college, my fraternity (which was historically Catholic... if not practicing at the time) arraigned for a priest to give a series of talks on God and science at our school (an engineering college). It made for some interesting talks. I'll have to see if I can dig up the notes I took at the time...

9
Sep/08
0

Ten texts help crack pope’s pontificate, mission, ministry

Interesting story from CNS on some texts that might offer insights into Pope Benedict XVI. I thought I might do some legwork to track down some links to the material referenced:

  1. The pope's sermon at his inauguration Mass April 24, 2005
  2. The introduction and Part 1 of his encyclical "Deus Caritas Est" ("God Is Love")
  3. His talk Dec. 22, 2005, to the Roman Curia
  4. His sermon Jan. 8, 2006, at a Mass with the baptism of infants
  5. His meeting with young people April 6, 2006
  6. His interview in August 2006 with German reporters ahead of his homecoming visit to Bavaria
  7. The pope's speech at Germany's University of Regensburg Sept. 12, 2006
  8. His letter to Chinese Catholics June 30, 2007
  9. His second encyclical, "Spe Salvi" ("Saved by Hope"), published in late 2007
  10. His weekly audience talk on St. Augustine Jan. 30

The article included some bonus references/readings:

8
Sep/08
0

Church includes Jewish interpretation of the Scriptures

One of the things I've always liked about the Catholic church is it's (most likely modern) willingness to work with other Christian and non-Christian religions. When I saw the following in this CNS news story

A Vatican official said about 15 fraternal delegates would attend; in addition, he said, Rabbi Shear Yashuv Cohen, the chief rabbi of Haifa, Israel, would be a special guest and lead a discussion for synod members on the Jewish interpretation of the Scriptures.

it reminded me of some of my past research on the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification.

I've always found it great that we include (and appreciate) others views as we think about our understanding. Perhaps that's just been my local experience and isn't representative of the Church, but I don't think that's the case. Other then my Jewish and Mormon friends, I find very few who are open and willing to discuss and learn from others outside their faith. I think many Christians are afraid to discuss their faith in a way that doesn't become a "he said, she said" argument.

Site speeded up by PHP Speedy Site speeded up by PHP Speedy