Reluctant Catholic Thoughts about the church and my faith.


11
May/09
0

Leaving and joining the church

Another interesting article by the Catholic News Service on why people leave their religions.

From the article:

Some cool interactive graphs from Pew, who conducted the study, can be found here along with the full report from the study.

19
Mar/09
0

Catholics are migrating south?

Saw this interesting article by the Catholic News Service on a survey on tracking how Christians identified themselves.

From the article:
Survey Results

17
Mar/09
0

God’s transcendence and immanence

In section 2 of What Catholic's Believe we look at God. The only part of this booklet that really stands out for me is the section on God's transcendence and immanence.

"Transcendent" means "more," it does not mean "absent."

As much as we can know about God, based on His revelation, He is still largely beyond the limits of our human experience and hence remains largely unknowable. That's transcendence. God is beyond our ordinary range of perception.

I think I like this section because, as much as we think we may know, we still know relatively little. I suspect some would say, "We know enough - we have revelation." But I feel like that doesn't do enough to acknowledge our limited ability to even understand what we think we know based on what's been reveled. Even simple precepts of the Church, have years of study and dialog behind them. It requires context, reflection, and debate to come to understanding. But even that, doesn't mean that we can still fully understand.

Take an arguably simple look at the human condition through something like "Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions." While I suspect there are deeper and more academic looks at the human condition (psychology and human behavior) than Dan Ariely's, I think he does a fantastic job of illustrating how even given the same information, we behave differently based on a variety of factors that may or may not have anything to do with what decision we're being asked to make. We simply can't know.

So where does this leave us? We can't experience God through normal perception. And even if we could, we likely couldn't trust our conclusions because of our biases and prejudices. I think that's okay. Again, I think that's where faith comes in - that's part of the fear and trembling.

10
Mar/09
0

Faith

In college, I read Fear and Trembling by Søren Kierkegaard. It was an incredibly influential work for me, not only because of the reading and class discussions, but also because of the discussions I had about the story outside of class. I loaned it to friends and listened to how they responded to it. I discussed it with a Jewish friend of mine, who gave me powerful insights based on his understanding of what his faith teaches of that story.

After I finished reading Fear and Trembling I began to view faith not as adherence to a religious practice, but instead as a very real and very scary belief and action. You necessarily can't come to faith through logic alone. To have faith, one must have the "strength of the absurd." This was a departure from the cafeteria-Catholic understanding of faith that I grew up with.

This post was inspired by my reading of the Luke E. Hart series based on the Catechism of the Catholic Church. This particular section of the series (and I don't know if they will all be this way) took what I view to be a shallow look at faith. It's overly concerned with the differences between Protestantism and Catholicism (which isn't what I care about when I'm reading something titled "What Catholics Believe"). And it doesn't do enough to address the need to be authentically religious. That is, you need to take the initiative to take responsibility for your own relationship with God.

For me, that's what faith is.

7
Mar/09
0

Market Economy and Ethics

I found the following article on “Church and Economy in Dialogue” which was presented by Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger in 1985 at a symposium in Rome. It's an interesting view of ethics and the economy. I'm trying to process it.

I'm a capitalist. I believe in a free economy and market forces. It's my opinion that many of the problems we see with capitalism happen because people (government) interfere with market forces. Don't get me wrong. I like the FDA. I want someone making sure I'm not eating diseased meat. I'm not saying I don't want regulation. However, if you look at current economic woes, I think much of how we got to where we are can be attributed to government involvement where they were trying "to do the right thing."

I was six years old in 1985, so I don't truly understand the context for the article. I know that. I appreciate some of the insights one can draw from the Ratzinger's ideas and I agree that there is a higher calling to bridge economic inequalities when they are as out of balance as they were then and are today. It's a difficult problem. I suspect I'll be thinking about this for a while.

27
Feb/09
0

Lenten practices

With the recent start of Lent, I felt it prudent to brush up on my understanding of Lenten practices. Most current articles focus on food and preparation. Preparation is of course is what Lent is all about, while food and what bad habits you've given up is what everyone talks about. I don't like the "give up" aspect of Lent because I feel it puts the focus on the wrong thing.

So when people ask what my Lenten sacrifice is, I don't really say anything. Might be the wrong approach, but I don't know how to talk about the topic without feeling like a hypocrite. I'm trying to increase my prayer and church attendance, and I'm also making a sacrifice, but talking about it like it's something I'm only doing because it's Lent feels wrong.

So, what does the Church say you should do during Lent? Well, there's no shortage of press on the topic. Here's what I was able to turn up with a quick scan of my RSS reader.

In Fasting out of love by Tara Little, you can find a nice short summary of what's required and encouraged:

During Lent Catholics 18 to 59 years old are required to fast on Ash Wednesday and Good Friday. This means eating only one regular meal and two smaller ones that do not equal a regular meal. (Code of Canon Law, cf. 1252))

Catholics are also encouraged to do acts of penance and charity beyond what is prescribed by the law. Many do this by "giving up" something like sweets or a bad habit. Others might add a daily rosary to their prayer life or visit the sick when they otherwise wouldn't.

More detailed explanations can be found in Lenten questions & answers by Father Erik Pohlmeier

Q. What are the rules about fasting and abstinence?
A. Ash Wednesday and Good Friday are days of fast and abstinence. The law of fasting allows one full meal and two smaller ones. The law of abstinence prohibits the eating of meat. Fridays of Lent are days of abstinence in the United States. The obligation of abstinence begins at age 14. The law of fasting obliges all between the ages of 18-59. Pastors and parents are to see to it that minors, though not bound by the law of fast and abstinence, are educated in the authentic sense of penance and encouraged to do acts of penance suitable to their age. All members of the Christian faithful are encouraged to do acts of penance and charity beyond what is prescribed by the law.

and

Q. Why can't we eat meat on Fridays?
A. This practice is one of the disciplines of Lent that has the goal of love and surrender to God. It requires a break in the normal routine of our day and serves as a reminder that the basic needs of life should point us to the goodness of God. Scripture has a long record of abstaining from certain foods as part of religious practice. In our day that practice continues, not because eating meat is bad, but as a discipline to turn the mind to God.

In Answering the call of Lent, Archbishop John C. Nienstedt offers some insight into some other common Lenten practices:

Many Catholics find time to go to daily Mass; others increase their prayer life with such devotions as the Stations of the Cross, the Chaplet of Divine Mercy, regular holy hours of adoration or the recitation of the rosary.

Still others join a Scripture group or attend a program on evan­gelization. I always try to organize some extra spiritual read­ing to ensure that these days are intellectually as well as spiritually beneficial. And, of course, these 40 days are the perfect time to examine our consciences and then confess our sins to a priest.

The invitation to participate personally in this liturgical season is so serious that any Catholic would be sorely remiss in not getting involved.

However, my favorite quote comes from Fasting during Lent: Getting to the heart of the matter by Joe Towalski. Joe has a quote from Pope Benedict XVI:

“fasting is an aid to open our eyes to the situation in which so many of our brothers and sisters live. . . . Voluntary fasting enables us to grow in the spirit of the Good Samaritan, who bends low and goes to the help of his suffering brother. By freely embracing an act of self-denial for the sake of another, we make a statement that our brother or sister in need is not a stranger.”

18
Jan/09
0

Mathematics as the language of God

The article Faith by Numbers by Sandro Magister has some excellent Benedict XVI quotes in it:

"The great Galileo said that God wrote the book of nature in the form of the language of mathematics. He was convinced that God has given us two books: the book of Sacred Scripture and the book of nature. And the language of nature – this was his conviction – is mathematics, so it is a language of God, a language of the Creator.

"Let us now reflect on what mathematics is: in itself, it is an abstract system, an invention of the human spirit which as such in its purity does not exist. It is always approximated, but as such is an intellectual system, a great, ingenious invention of the human spirit. The surprising thing is that this invention of our human intellect is truly the key to understanding nature, that nature is truly structured in a mathematical way, and that our mathematics, invented by our human mind, is truly the instrument for working with nature, to put it at our service, to use it through technology.

"It seems to me almost incredible that an invention of the human mind and the structure of the universe coincide. Mathematics, which we invented, really gives us access to the nature of the universe and makes it possible for us to use it. Therefore, the intellectual structure of the human subject and the objective structure of reality coincide: the subjective reason and the objective reason of nature are identical. I think that this coincidence between what we thought up and how nature is fulfilled and behaves is a great enigma and a great challenge, for we see that, in the end, it is 'one' reason that links them both. Our reason could not discover this other reason were there not an identical antecedent reason for both.

"In this sense it really seems to me that mathematics – in which as such God cannot appear – shows us the intelligent structure of the universe. Now, there are also theories of chaos, but they are limited because if chaos had the upper hand, all technology would become impossible. Only because our mathematics is reliable, is technology reliable. Our knowledge, which is at last making it possible to work with the energies of nature, supposes the reliable and intelligent structure of matter. Thus, we see that there is a subjective rationality and an objectified rationality in matter which coincide. Of course, no one can now prove – as is proven in an experiment, in technical laws – that they both really originated in a single intelligence, but it seems to me that this unity of intelligence, behind the two intelligences, really appears in our world. And the more we can delve into the world with our intelligence, the more clearly the plan of Creation appears.

"In the end, to reach the definitive question I would say: God exists or he does not exist. There are only two options. Either one recognizes the priority of reason, of creative Reason that is at the beginning of all things and is the principle of all things – the priority of reason is also the priority of freedom –, or one holds the priority of the irrational, inasmuch as everything that functions on our earth and in our lives would be only accidental, marginal, an irrational result – reason would be a product of irrationality. One cannot ultimately 'prove' either project, but the great option of Christianity is the option for rationality and for the priority of reason. This seems to me to be an excellent option, which shows us that behind everything is a great Intelligence to which we can entrust ourselves.

"However, the true problem challenging faith today seems to me to be the evil in the world: we ask ourselves how it can be compatible with the Creator's rationality. And here we truly need God, who was made flesh and shows us that he is not only a mathematical reason but that this original Reason is also Love. If we look at the great options, the Christian option today is the one that is the most rational and the most human. Therefore, we can confidently work out a philosophy, a vision of the world based on this priority of reason, on this trust that the creating Reason is love and that this love is God."

The article goes on to do some analysis of those quotes. It's quite interesting.

31
Dec/08
0

Technological age

I found this news story from 2005 and noticed an interesting quote from Pope Benedict XVI:

Today we can dispose of vast material resources. But the men and women in our technological age risk becoming victims of their own intellectual and technical achievements, ending up in spiritual barrenness and emptiness of heart. That is why it is so important for us to open our minds and hearts to the Birth of Christ, this event of salvation which can give new hope to the life of each human being.

The risk of becoming a victim of my own intellectual or technical achievements is very real for me.

29
Dec/08
0

Centesimus Annus – Introduction

The following is part one of a seven part-series on Centesimus Annus.

In this part, we look at the Introduction:

1. The Centenary of the promulgation of the Encyclical which begins with the words "Rerum novarum",1 by my predecessor of venerable memory Pope Leo XIII, is an occasion of great importance for the present history of the Church and for my own Pontificate. It is an Encyclical that has the distinction of having been commemorated by solemn Papal documents from its fortieth anniversary to its ninetieth. It may be said that its path through history has been marked by other documents which paid tribute to it and applied it to the circumstances of the day.2

In doing likewise for the hundredth anniversary, in response to requests from many Bishops, Church institutions, and study centres, as well as business leaders and workers, both individually and as members of associations, I wish first and foremost to satisfy the debt of gratitude which the whole Church owes to this great Pope and his "immortal document".3 I also mean to show that the vital energies rising from that root have not been spent with the passing of the years, but rather have increased even more. This is evident from the various initiatives which have preceded, and which are to accompany and follow the celebration, initiatives promoted by Episcopal Conferences, by international agencies, universities and academic institutes, by professional associations and by other institutions and individuals in many parts of the world.

2. The present Encyclical is part of these celebrations, which are meant to thank God — the origin of "every good endowment and every perfect gift" (Jas 1:17) — for having used a document published a century ago by the See of Peter to achieve so much good and to radiate so much light in the Church and in the world. Although the commemoration at hand is meant to honour Rerum novarum, it also honours those Encyclicals and other documents of my Predecessors which have helped to make Pope Leo's Encyclical present and alive in history, thus constituting what would come to be called the Church's "social doctrine", "social teaching" or even "social magisterium".

The validity of this teaching has already been pointed out in two Encyclicals published during my Pontificate: Laborem exercens on human work, and Sollicitudo rei socialis on current problems regarding the development of individuals and peoples.4

3. I now wish to propose a "re-reading" of Pope Leo's Encyclical by issuing an invitation to "look back" at the text itself in order to discover anew the richness of the fundamental principles which it formulated for dealing with the question of the condition of workers. But this is also an invitation to "look around" at the "new things" which surround us and in which we find ourselves caught up, very different from the "new things" which characterized the final decade of the last century. Finally, it is an invitation to "look to the future" at a time when we can already glimpse the third Millennium of the Christian era, so filled with uncertainties but also with promises — uncertainties and promises which appeal to our imagination and creativity, and which reawaken our responsibility, as disciples of the "one teacher" (cf. Mt 23:8), to show the way, to proclaim the truth and to communicate the life which is Christ (cf. Jn 14:6).

A re-reading of this kind will not only confirm the permanent value of such teaching, but will also manifest the true meaning of the Church's Tradition which, being ever living and vital, builds upon the foundation laid by our fathers in the faith, and particularly upon what "the Apostles passed down to the Church"5 in the name of Jesus Christ, who is her irreplaceable foundation (cf. 1 Cor 3:11).

It was out of an awareness of his mission as the Successor of Peter that Pope Leo XIII proposed to speak out, and Peter's Successor today is moved by that same awareness. Like Pope Leo and the Popes before and after him, I take my inspiration from the Gospel image of "the scribe who has been trained for the kingdom of heaven", whom the Lord compares to "a householder who brings out of his treasure what is new and what is old" (Mt 13:52). The treasure is the great outpouring of the Church's Tradition, which contains "what is old" — received and passed on from the very beginning — and which enables us to interpret the "new things" in the midst of which the life of the Church and the world unfolds.

Among the things which become "old" as a result of being incorporated into Tradition, and which offer opportunities and material for enriching both Tradition and the life of faith, there is the fruitful activity of many millions of people, who, spurred on by the social Magisterium, have sought to make that teaching the inspiration for their involvement in the world. Acting either as individuals or joined together in various groups, associations and organizations, these people represent a great movement for the defence of the human person and the safeguarding of human dignity. Amid changing historical circumstances, this movement has contributed to the building up of a more just society or at least to the curbing of injustice.

The present Encyclical seeks to show the fruitfulness of the principles enunciated by Leo XIII, which belong to the Church's doctrinal patrimony and, as such, involve the exercise of her teaching authority. But pastoral solicitude also prompts me to propose an analysis of some events of recent history. It goes without saying that part of the responsibility of Pastors is to give careful consideration to current events in order to discern the new requirements of evangelization. However, such an analysis is not meant to pass definitive judgments since this does not fall per se within the Magisterium's specific domain.

The introduction is really a tribute to Pope Leo XIII's Rerum Novarum from 1891. I've not read Rerum Novarum before, and it occurs to be that perhaps I should. We'll see how Centesimus Annus goes...

21
Dec/08
0

Christmas Prayer

While looking for text for a Christmas card this year, I found this fantastic prayer (really part of the text for a general audience on Christ's birth) by Pope Benedict XVI :

May the kind and loving good wishes that we exchange in these days reach all the contexts of our daily lives. May peace be in our hearts so that they are open to the action of God's grace. May peace dwell in families and may they spend Christmas united in front of the crib and the tree decorated with lights. May the message of solidarity and good will that comes from Christmas contribute to creating a deeper sensitivity to the old and new forms of poverty, to the common good, in which we are all called to participate. May all members of the family community, especially children, the elderly, the weakest, feel the warmth of this feast and may it extend subsequently to all the days in the year.

Site Optimization by PHP Speedy Site Optimization by PHP Speedy